Do you work primarily from reference material, such as sketches or photography, or is your work more significantly informed by memory or imagination?
For my whole life, I’ve worked really hard at looking and observing and trying to faithfully represent what’s there in front of me and to be as objective and loyal as possible. I feel like I’ve probably bashed away imagination and memory, and I need source material there. In the past, I relied on sketchbooks to gather source material, and then painted from my sketches and notes and things. I’ve also painted plein air. At the moment, I think the most important thing for me is colour, colour accuracy, light, and tone. So I tend to work primarily from photos these days, although I still always carry a sketchbook. The only way, really, to record color as accurately as I can see it is from photos. I paint from photos using my phone so the photos are tiny. I can’t see any detail, all I’ve got is the color. And then everything else that comes is memory, because all I’ve got in front of me is color and the vaguest of shapes.
The representation of light in your paintings is really spectacular. I was wondering if you could tell us a little bit more about your relationship with light and how you are able to capture that within your paintings?
Cézanne apparently said of Monet, ‘he sees with an innocent eye’, and Monet’s one of my favourite painters. There’s a real detachment from what he’s seeing, the subject. He’s just seeing the light. That’s the way I’ve found best to engage with the landscape. In fact, there’s a lot of… environment and environmental causes in the landscape that can get quite political, so I’ve found the best way to look at it is in that very objective way. It’s a good way to look at the world in general, especially if you have political ideas. You want to be honest about things, look at things objectively and realistically, so you can be honest about what you say about it. That ties in really well with just looking at the light falling on things. You don’t have to make any decisions or kind of curatorial choices in your painting, it’s just there for you already. It democratises the landscape. You can have the most beautiful light falling on just the most mundane or vulgar or not stereotypically beautiful landscape. I’ve seen the most radiant sunsets on a car park, behind a grotty bit of town, where the puddles are lit up in pinks and purples and it just turns into a romantic painting. The subject is secondary. It’s the light that is the beautiful thing in it. Light can fall on anything and make it gorgeous, and you can ignore what you’re looking at and just enjoy the light and colours, I think but there’s also this… light is what you see first when you’re bleary-eyed in the morning, it’s what you’re first aware of when you’re born, it’s just the very first thing, it’s the real primal thing that everyone has access to. It doesn’t need explaining. It’s warmth and it’s life. It’s a primal thing to engage with.